<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s baby names nothing like the popular 50s and 60s&#8217; ones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entertainmentandshowbiz.com/todays-baby-names-nothing-like-the-popular-50s-and-60s-ones-20080710150/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entertainmentandshowbiz.com/todays-baby-names-nothing-like-the-popular-50s-and-60s-ones-20080710150</link>
	<description>Entertainment, Showbiz, Celebrities, Television, Movies, Fashion!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:43:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: baby boy</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentandshowbiz.com/todays-baby-names-nothing-like-the-popular-50s-and-60s-ones-20080710150/comment-page-1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>baby boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 15:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentandshowbiz.com/?p=150#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I prefer the old fashion names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the old fashion names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
